I just won an award for the work I do for my individual and small business clients. This is actually the third year in a row that I have won this award. It is "The Best OF Westerville 2013 Award For The Financial Planning Category"
Monday, August 26, 2013
If you designed the perfect financial product would it look like this?
Many clients tell me they are looking for several contradictory objectives in an IDEAL financial product!
First, they want to know their principal is safe!
Second, they want a reasonable rate of return on their money!
Third, they want liquidity!
If a product could do all of these thing would you agree that this is a nearly perfect financial product?
A bank can give you the first and third items from the list but will not deliver the second. The market can give you the second and the third but cannot guarantee the first.
Its now possible to get a financial product that offers 100% liquidity from day one. Even though it offers great liquidity it is designed and optimized for long term growth or even for legacy purposes.
In addition it offers a reasonable rate of return in some configurations or the upside potential for double digit annual returns of over 12% in the best years and a mid single digit (4-7%) returns in an average year. It delivers all of this potential with outstanding safety and protection of principal.
That's the good news.
Now for the bad news. Not everyone can qualify to purchase this type of product. Minimum $ limits also apply. Contact us if interested in learning if this is right for you!
First, they want to know their principal is safe!
Second, they want a reasonable rate of return on their money!
Third, they want liquidity!
If a product could do all of these thing would you agree that this is a nearly perfect financial product?
A bank can give you the first and third items from the list but will not deliver the second. The market can give you the second and the third but cannot guarantee the first.
Its now possible to get a financial product that offers 100% liquidity from day one. Even though it offers great liquidity it is designed and optimized for long term growth or even for legacy purposes.
In addition it offers a reasonable rate of return in some configurations or the upside potential for double digit annual returns of over 12% in the best years and a mid single digit (4-7%) returns in an average year. It delivers all of this potential with outstanding safety and protection of principal.
That's the good news.
Now for the bad news. Not everyone can qualify to purchase this type of product. Minimum $ limits also apply. Contact us if interested in learning if this is right for you!
Friday, June 21, 2013
New financial products available
Everyone knows that interest rates have been extremely low for over 3-4 years. It's part of the the Federal Reserve Banks plan to "help the economy". Even with the slight increase in interest rate in the past week or so it is still almost impossible to earn a decent yet safe rate of return on our
money.
Did you know that it is possible to obtain a 6% guaranteed interest rate on a 96 month financial product. There are minimum purchase amounts of $40,000 - 60,000 with a maximumum of approximately $250,000. These are not liquid but you do receive monthly payments including but some return of principal and interest. Payments are level throughout the 8 year term. The interest rate is guaranteed at time of issue and payment of the contract. There is also a high degree of safety with this type of contract. This is what I would consider a Safe Money product with no stock market risk. They are compatible with a ROTH or Traditional IRA or can be used with non qualified money as well.
I think it is good to know that a reasonable Bank alternative is available today. Why would anyone want to put that amount of money in a bank anyway?
money.
Did you know that it is possible to obtain a 6% guaranteed interest rate on a 96 month financial product. There are minimum purchase amounts of $40,000 - 60,000 with a maximumum of approximately $250,000. These are not liquid but you do receive monthly payments including but some return of principal and interest. Payments are level throughout the 8 year term. The interest rate is guaranteed at time of issue and payment of the contract. There is also a high degree of safety with this type of contract. This is what I would consider a Safe Money product with no stock market risk. They are compatible with a ROTH or Traditional IRA or can be used with non qualified money as well.
I think it is good to know that a reasonable Bank alternative is available today. Why would anyone want to put that amount of money in a bank anyway?
Wednesday, April 3, 2013
"The Rule of 100" and Preserving and Growing Your Assets
Some of you know about "The Rule of 100" but everyone should know it and understand how it works. Simply put this rule help you determine a smart allocation strategy that helps protect your assets from excessive market risk. Protection from market risk is critical as we age in order to preserve our assets for the second stage of our lives. The first stage of Financial Life is Asset Growth and Accumulation . This is followed by the Asset Distribution Stage or Retirement Stage of Financial Life. As we get older and unfortunately we all do, we need to transition from maximizing accumulation to the preservation and distribution of our assets. Different types of professional specialize in helping plan and implement these different strategies. Some people even think of this as a three stage process. They group them into, Accumulation, Transition and Distribution or Retirement.
The Risk we can safely tolerate needs to drop if we hope to properly preserve our assets for the retirement years. A five year recession is not an absolute disaster when we are 35 and have 30 or more years to make up for the downturns that WILL Happen. Notice I said WILL and not May happen. On average we have 2-3 bad years every decade. We have 3-5 average years and 2-3 really good years. This trend is clearly shown in economic theory and actual history going back 100 years.
Not considering this in your financial plan is one of the major reasons people run out of assets in retirement. The second major reason people run out of money is simply not saving enough in the earning years. The best solution is to learn and benefit from THE RULE OF 100. The rule states that you subtract your current age from 100 and the answer represents the maximum percentage of your assets that should be exposed to market risk. As an example a 55 year old should have no more than 45% of their assets exposed to market risk. Some people have less market risk tolerance and should have less exposure. As we age the formula means that we need to further adjust our risk % allocation over time. Using SAFE Money strategies gives us the opportunity to include Safe Money Products and still have up side potential growth that can beat inflation and allow us to keep up with the rising Consumer Price Index (CPI). Unfortunately a Bank doesn't allow one to keep up with the rate of inflation. It has been 20 years or more since banks have paid a decent rate of return to their depositors. This means that you have less buying power at the end of December than you had on January 1st. There are other forms of Safe Money Assets that can protect and grow your assets and still produce a reasonable Rate of Return.
The Risk we can safely tolerate needs to drop if we hope to properly preserve our assets for the retirement years. A five year recession is not an absolute disaster when we are 35 and have 30 or more years to make up for the downturns that WILL Happen. Notice I said WILL and not May happen. On average we have 2-3 bad years every decade. We have 3-5 average years and 2-3 really good years. This trend is clearly shown in economic theory and actual history going back 100 years.
Not considering this in your financial plan is one of the major reasons people run out of assets in retirement. The second major reason people run out of money is simply not saving enough in the earning years. The best solution is to learn and benefit from THE RULE OF 100. The rule states that you subtract your current age from 100 and the answer represents the maximum percentage of your assets that should be exposed to market risk. As an example a 55 year old should have no more than 45% of their assets exposed to market risk. Some people have less market risk tolerance and should have less exposure. As we age the formula means that we need to further adjust our risk % allocation over time. Using SAFE Money strategies gives us the opportunity to include Safe Money Products and still have up side potential growth that can beat inflation and allow us to keep up with the rising Consumer Price Index (CPI). Unfortunately a Bank doesn't allow one to keep up with the rate of inflation. It has been 20 years or more since banks have paid a decent rate of return to their depositors. This means that you have less buying power at the end of December than you had on January 1st. There are other forms of Safe Money Assets that can protect and grow your assets and still produce a reasonable Rate of Return.
Thursday, March 28, 2013
Buy Tem and Invest the Difference! Is this sound advice?
Many readers listen or watch Suze Orman or Dave Ramsey in their finance shows. Don't get me wrong. I like them both. However there is one area where they always give bad advice! That is when they tell clients to only buy Term Insurance and Invest the savings. I do sell Term insurance but I generally use it as a supplement to a Cash Value Life Insurance policy that will always be there when the client or their family needs it. There are several problems with Dave and Suze's logic.
First,
what happens if you need to provide insurance for several years past the original term? One of several things happens, your policy expires with you receiving no benefit whatsoever, or if the policy permits you to keep paying, the premium jumps as much as 10-15 fold for each additional year with an insurance need, or the policy expires worthless and due to your then current age and health you have become Medically Uninsurable.
Second,
The problem relates to the actual math involved. A recent article in a professional publication demonstrated that the math often does not work out the way they suggest it should. I wont include the publication here but would gladly share the information and the math with readers individually. The real world numbers indicate that especially in a low interest rate environment (does this sound at all like like 2009- 2015) you are potentilly well ahead by buying a Cash value Life insurance product. The author illustrated a Whole life product but there are some other products that can perform even better.
Third,
This problem deals with the rate of return that they project when they do their projections. Both of them talk about making 7-8% per year on their portfolio. How many readers can honestly say that they have seen a 7-8% rate of return on their market risk assets in the past 10 years? Im willing to bet its no more thn one in a hundred who have seen that ten year return. IF you have then your 2003 $100,000 would now be worth $216,000 in 2013. This assums that you added no more money to the account in that 10 yr period. If the average investor did not turn 100K into 216K then the performance numbers quoted by Dave and Suze dont work out!!! You can make that in a good year but they fail to deal with the MASSIVE impact of the down years. Unfortunately real world investors suffer in the down years unless they are using some SAFE MONEY assets in the financial plan.
Fourth,
Its very hard to beat the potential Tax advantages of a properly designed and properly funded Cash Value Life Insurance policy. Nothing Beats Tax Free Income!!
I suggest that often a fiscally smarter way to go is to combine several insurance products. At least they should consider a Term and a Cash Vale policy to minimize premium expense and maximize protection for their premium dollars. Of course everyones situation is different and thats why they should consult with a licensed insurance professional to help analyse their specific needs.
First,
what happens if you need to provide insurance for several years past the original term? One of several things happens, your policy expires with you receiving no benefit whatsoever, or if the policy permits you to keep paying, the premium jumps as much as 10-15 fold for each additional year with an insurance need, or the policy expires worthless and due to your then current age and health you have become Medically Uninsurable.
Second,
The problem relates to the actual math involved. A recent article in a professional publication demonstrated that the math often does not work out the way they suggest it should. I wont include the publication here but would gladly share the information and the math with readers individually. The real world numbers indicate that especially in a low interest rate environment (does this sound at all like like 2009- 2015) you are potentilly well ahead by buying a Cash value Life insurance product. The author illustrated a Whole life product but there are some other products that can perform even better.
Third,
This problem deals with the rate of return that they project when they do their projections. Both of them talk about making 7-8% per year on their portfolio. How many readers can honestly say that they have seen a 7-8% rate of return on their market risk assets in the past 10 years? Im willing to bet its no more thn one in a hundred who have seen that ten year return. IF you have then your 2003 $100,000 would now be worth $216,000 in 2013. This assums that you added no more money to the account in that 10 yr period. If the average investor did not turn 100K into 216K then the performance numbers quoted by Dave and Suze dont work out!!! You can make that in a good year but they fail to deal with the MASSIVE impact of the down years. Unfortunately real world investors suffer in the down years unless they are using some SAFE MONEY assets in the financial plan.
Fourth,
Its very hard to beat the potential Tax advantages of a properly designed and properly funded Cash Value Life Insurance policy. Nothing Beats Tax Free Income!!
I suggest that often a fiscally smarter way to go is to combine several insurance products. At least they should consider a Term and a Cash Vale policy to minimize premium expense and maximize protection for their premium dollars. Of course everyones situation is different and thats why they should consult with a licensed insurance professional to help analyse their specific needs.
Wednesday, March 27, 2013
What Happens to Bonds When Interest Rates Rise?
This weekend an interesting article appeard in the Columbus Dispatch in the business section. It was titled "Bond-Lovers still buying despite risk, stock highs." In a recent month investors put $32 Billion into Bond Mutual Funds. This becomes a potential issue when interest rates are at all time record lows. Do you think that interest rates one, three or five years from now will be lower or higher than they are today? Can they get much lower? Can they get much higher? Is there upside interest rate risk? What happens to existing values when rates are rising? Simple economics answers that question. Existing prices fall when interest rate rise. The article further states "With Bond prices rising and interest yields at historic lows the risk has picked up significantly" The article is worth reading!
When customers wish to minimize their risks Safe Money products might be a logical part of a financial portfolio. Asset diversification is always very important.
Did you know that there are products that can guarantee lifetime income without any market risk?
I'm not telling anyone to buy something or to sell anything. I'm just sharing a nice article worth reading.
When customers wish to minimize their risks Safe Money products might be a logical part of a financial portfolio. Asset diversification is always very important.
Did you know that there are products that can guarantee lifetime income without any market risk?
I'm not telling anyone to buy something or to sell anything. I'm just sharing a nice article worth reading.
Saturday, March 23, 2013
OBAMA CARE The Afordable Care Act (ACA)
Not may people know that most of Obama Care enabling legislation didn't deal with health care at all. Most of the bill actually dealt with new and onerous tax increases needed to fund the bill. Did you know that all females have maternity coverage burried in the cost of premiums. Thats a mixed blessing of course. If a woman is Sexually active, married and in child bearing age. Its not necessary to add the cost of the premium for a woman who isnt sexually active or is beyond child bearing age. However courtesy of Obama its in there!
Did you know that every real estate transaction will involve a better than 3% federal tax on a home sale. We are not talking about a tax on short or long term gains. We are talking about a new massive tax incurred even if you loose money on a home sale. There are dozens and dozens of these new Taxes, Fines and Fees hidden in the 1000 plus pages of this legislation.
That just doesn't seem right to me.
What do you think???
Did you know that every real estate transaction will involve a better than 3% federal tax on a home sale. We are not talking about a tax on short or long term gains. We are talking about a new massive tax incurred even if you loose money on a home sale. There are dozens and dozens of these new Taxes, Fines and Fees hidden in the 1000 plus pages of this legislation.
That just doesn't seem right to me.
What do you think???
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
